Brett A. August

Phone: 312-554-7962

Email: baugust@pattishall.com

Intellectual Property News

Education

  • Yale Law School (J.D. 1977); Associate Editor, Yale Studies in World Public Order; President, Yale Association of International Law
  • University of Rouen, France (awarded 2nd and 3rd degrees of higher education, with honors)
  • University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign (B.A., 1974, Political Science 1974; B.A., 1974, French Linguistics 1974; magna cum laude)
    Phi Beta Kappa, Bronze Tablet Award

Bar Admissions

Illinois

Industry Expertise

View List

Honors & Awards

View List

Trials, Appeals & Litigation

View List

ADR

View List

Professional Activities

View List

Publications

View List

Presentations

View List

Brett A. August

How can Pattishall help protect my business?
Your brands, website and advertising materials are the way customers and potential customers identify your business. We can help you create a strong identity for your business and your goods and services, and then protect them from encroachment or theft by competitors and others. We do this by helping you: (1) choose brands that are not likely to be confused with other brands already in the marketplace; (2) present those brands in a way that enhances their value as trademarks; (3) identify threats to your brands; and (4) take action to prevent those threats from decreasing or destroying the value of your brands

What are your areas of concentration?
Trademarks, brand development and protection, false advertising and other forms of unfair competition, Internet and e-commerce, domain names.

What industries have you represented?
Our firm assists clients in virtually all business sectors. I have represented clients in diverse industries such as automotive, apparel, travel and hospitality, food service, wine, home furnishings, banking, financial services, consumer durables, real estate, health-care, capital goods, oil and gas, Internet services, and computer software, hardware and equipment.

How would you describe some of the issues you've dealt with in your substantive areas?
For a financial services company, I led a litigation team that stopped a competitor from using advertising that was truthful but misleading, and won the client an award of treble damages and legal fees. Recently I successfully argued an appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals for a manufacturer of consumer durables that resulted in payment to our client--the defendant in a trademark-infringement case--of many millions of dollars in settlement.

I handled a particularly interesting case on behalf of an Internet portal company that involved international cyber-piracy. A pornography site hijacked our client's identity to drive traffic to its websites, then gave false WHOIS information to prevent detection. When attempts to serve the defendant by traditional means all failed, we created new law in the 6th Circuit by convincing the trial court to permit us to effect service of process by e-mail, resulting in a series of rulings in our client's favor.

What are your specific qualifications and skills as an IP lawyer?
Clients are best served by a lawyer who listens to your specific problems and understand your goals. My seven years as in-house counsel to a Fortune 500 company taught me that knowing the law is not as important as using the law to solve the client's problem. I've used that approach to create a national practice focused on practical and cost-effective solutions.

How does Pattishall's "team approach" differ from other law firms?
Pattishall is unique in that it has dozens of attorneys with similar practices who work in a setting that promotes open sharing of ideas, knowledge and experience. When clients hire a Pattishall lawyer, they are really hiring an entire team of bright, accomplished and dedicated lawyers whose top priority is resolving their intellectual property problems. And we do it without "over-lawyering"--a difference I understand well from my years as in-house counsel.

What are the qualifications and skills a client should look for in an IP lawyer?
Many young lawyers believe they serve their clients by being as combative and adversarial as possible and by practicing "scorched earth" litigation. That approach can make dialog with opposing counsel difficult, if not impossible. Although it is sometimes necessary to institute a lawsuit to protect the client's interests, my years of resolving disputes--in and out of court--have taught me that the parties are often able to identify a workable solution. If a lawyer is not able to communicate effectively with opposing counsel, settlement discussions are less likely to take place and to succeed.

What personal and professional qualities do you have that benefit your clients?
I'm very active in the community. For example, I've taught law-school students, handled adoptions of cocaine-addicted babies from the inner city, founded non-profit organizations and served as an officer or on the board of several others. These activities help me maintain an important sense of balance and perspective that I am able to bring to work for clients.

Industry Expertise

  • Automobiles & Components
  • Banks
  • Capital Goods
  • Consumer Durables & Apparel
  • Diversified Financials
  • Food & Beverage
  • Health Care Equipment & Services
  • Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
  • Insurance
  • Media
  • Real Estate
  • Retailing
  • Software & Services
  • Technology Hardware & Equipment
  • Transportation

back to top

Honors & Awards

  • 2012 Illinois Super Lawyers : An Illinois "Super Lawyer"
  • 2012 Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register : AV® Rated Preeminent Lawyer
  • 2011 Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register : AV® Rated Preeminent Lawyer
  • 2011 Illinois Super Lawyers Magazine : An Illinois "Super Lawyer"
  • 2010 Leading Lawyers Magazine, Business Edition : Selected as a "Top Business Lawyer in Intellectual Property Law in Illinois"
  • 2010 Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register : AV® Rated Preeminent Lawyer
  • 2010 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Litigation
  • 2010 Super Lawyers, Corporate Counsel Edition : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Litigation
  • 2009 Chicago Lawyer Magazine : Selected as a "Top Intellectual Property Lawyer in Illinois" by Leading Lawyers Network
  • 2009 Leading Lawyers Network Magazine : A "Leading Lawyer" in Intellectual Property
  • 2009 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2008 Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register : AV® Rated Preeminent Lawyer
  • 2008 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2007 Leading Lawyers Network Magazine : Named a "Leading Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2007 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2007 Chicago Lawyers : One of the Top 100 Illinois Lawyers
  • 2006 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2005 Law & Politics : An Illinois "Super Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2005 Law Bulletin Publishing Company : Selected as a "Leading Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law
  • 2004 Law Bulletin Publishing Company : Selected as a "Leading Lawyer" in Intellectual Property Law

back to top

Trials, Appeals & Litigation

  • EMC Corp. v. Promise Technology, Inc., Opposition No. 91201616 (TTAB 2011) (Trademark)
  • Cloverhill Pastry-Vend, LLC v. 10 Star Enterprises, Inc., Opposition No. 91181131 (TTAB) (Trademark)
  • ACT, Inc. v. ACT Certification, Opposition No. 91198246 (TTAB 2011) (opposition sustained) (Trademark Opposition)
  • Decho Corporation v. Mueller, Opposition No. 91183001 (TTAB 2011) (Trademark)
  • Ashley Furniture Inds. v. Laura Ashley, American Arbitration Association (AAA) Case No. 51133Y0105608 (lead trial counsel) (Trademark, Breach of Contract)
  • RSA Security Inc. v. Cryptometrics Canada Inc., Canadian Opposition to Appl. No. 1,245,903 (won trademark Opposition) (Trademark)
  • Jerome Viger-Kohler v. Alexandre Cammas, Opposition No. 91192632 (TTAB 2010) (won Opposition against foreign applicant) (Trademark)
  • EMC Corporation v. EMC Telecom Corporation, Opposition No. 91191905 (TTAB 2009) (won Opposition) (Trademark)
  • VoiceCloud v. VMware, Inc., Opposition No. 91191589 (TTAB 2009) (Trademark)
  • Carnival plc v. Service Online LLC, WIPO Case No. D2009-1142 (WIPO, Panelist Savelieva) (Domain name transferred to client despite attempts by infringer to hide his identity, insist on right to file answer in Russian, and claim domain refers to geographic area and not to complainant's mark) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • RSA Security, Inc. v. WorldExtend, LLC, Opposition No. 91187455 (TTAB 2009) (Opposition is sustained and registration to applicant is refused) (Trademark)
  • RSA Security, Inc. v. Trilegiant Corporation, Opposition No. 91180355 (TTAB 2009) (Trademark)
  • EMC Corporation v. The American Society of American Engineers, Opposition No. 91182389 (TTAB 2009) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • EMC Corporation v. Proview Technology, Inc., Cancellation No. 92050001 (TTAB 2009) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • EMC Corporation v. Proview Electronics Co., Ltd., Cancellation No. 92050000 (TTAB 2009) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • Paxar Americas, Inc. v. SPX Corporation, Opposition No. 91173386 (TTAB 2009) (Trademark)
  • Paxar Americas, Inc. v. SPX Corporation, Cancellation No. 92046656 (TTAB 2009) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems (now Paxar Corporation) v. Kap Graphics, Case No. 1:1993cv05082 (N.D. Ill. 2009, Judge Bucklo) (Paxar awarded $2 million in damages plus attorneys' fees) (General)
  • Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC v. Performance Specialists, LLC, Opposition No. 91184804 (TTAB 2009) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Navistar International Corporation v. National Life Insurance Company, Opposition No. 91181921 (TTAB 2008) (Trademark)
  • Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al. (including Internet REIT), 552 F.Supp.2d 752 and 2008 WL 2959951 (N.D. Ill. 2008, Judge Manning) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology, Trademark Infringement)
  • EMC Corporation v. Triangle Medical Solutions, Opposition No. 91181803 (TTAB 2008) (Case settled, opposition dismissed without prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Internet REIT, Inc. v. Mighty Net, Inc., Cancellation No. 92048728 (TTAB 2008) (Trademark)
  • The Buona Companies, L.L.C. v. AFC Enterprises, Case No. 1:2008cv00757 (N.D. Ill. 2008, Judge Bucklo) (Trademark Infringement)
  • ACT, Inc. v. 9008 Group, Inc., Opposition No. 91181760 (TTAB 2008) (Applicant amended services) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. T W, Case No. FA0712001124315 (NAF 2008) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Santa Margherita v. Vintwood International, Case No. 1:2006cv05913 (N.D. Ill. 2007, Judge Gettleman) (Trade Dress)
  • Internet REIT, Inc. v. Gittoes, Cancellation No. 92047556 (TTAB 2007) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • Vanlines.com LLC v. Movers.com, Case No. 1:2006cv14250 (S.D.N.Y. 2007, Judge Chin) (Case dismissed) (Trade Dress)
  • Expedia, Inc. (plaintiff in multiple cases for domain name infringement), Case Nos. FA0710001088989, FA0708001059641, FA0708001053504, FA0707001026464, FA0706001021106, FA0705000995669, FA0705000991075, FA0705000990335FA0704000970858, FA0704000954076, FA0702000925402, FA0701000903078, FA0701000904266, FA0701000881130, FA0701000882386, FA0612000873346, FA0612000873343, FA0612000864664 (NAF 2007) (Domain names transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Carnival Plc v. DRS Expired Domain, Case No. D2007-0808 (WIPO 2007) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Carnival Plc (plaintiff in multiple cases for domain name infringement), Case Nos. FA0706000997910, FA0706001015446, FA0706000997970, FA0706000997916, FA0706000997973, FA0706001015100, FA070600097923, FA0706000997914, FA0706000997909 (NAF 2007) (Domain names transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Carnival Plc v. Sebastian Szerer, Case No. D2007-0807 (WIPO 2007) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Paxar Americas Inc. v. eNom Inc., 84 U.S.P.Q.2d 1730 (National Arbitration Forum 2007) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Evalue Technology, Opposition No. 91169415 (TTAB 2007) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Cielo e Terr S.p.A. v. Blavod Extreme Spirits, Opposition No. 91172149 (TTAB 2007) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Popular Enterprises, LLC (plaintiff in multiple cases for domain name infringement), Case Nos. FA070100887642, FA070100890762, FA070100892424 (NAF 2007) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Country Creations v. Banwart, Opposition No. 91173418 (TTAB 2007) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • ACT, Inc. v. Destra Consulting, Opposition No. 91172433 (TTAB 2007) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. (plaintiff in multiple cases for domain name infringement), Case Nos. FA0611100839813, FA0611000836960, FA0611000831138, FA0610000827672, FA0610000819788, FA0610000823228, FA0610000817308, FA0610000817906, FA0610000817182, FA0608000775183, FA0607000744567, FA0606000728555, FA0606000728482, FA0605000713759, FA0605000713698, FA0605000713702, FA0603000669287, FA0602000638204, FA0602000638211, FA0601000619465, FA0602000637951, FA0512000612060, FA0512000610151, FA0612000612065, FA0512000612052, FA0512000608223(NAF 2006) (Domain names transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Sung-A Jang, Case No. FA0610000811921 (NAF 2006) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • The Happy Chef, Inc. v. Chefwear, Inc., Cancellation No. 92044105 (TTAB 2006) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Chefwear, Inc. v. Pierce Sales Co., Inc., Cancellation No. 92045880 (TTAB 2006) (Registration cancelled) (Trademark)
  • Fashion Seal v. Chefwear, Cancellation No. 92044193 (TTAB 2006) (Cancellation dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Domainsource.com, Case No. FA0608000781931 (NAF 2006) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Paxar Americas, Inc. v. Zebra Technologies Corporation, Case No. 3:2003cv00142 (S.D. Ohio 2006, Judge Rice) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Expedia, Inc. (plaintiff in multiple cases for domain name infringement), Case Nos. FA0508000538533, FA0507000520654, FA0507000518046, FA0504000465292, FA0505000482611, FA0504000467054, FA0503000442294, FA0502000429084, FA0412000381271 (NAF 2005) (Domain names transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Paxar Americas, Inc. v. Harvard Battery, Inc., Case No. 3:2005cv00080 (S.D. Ohio, Judge Rose) (General)
  • Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Webcom Media Group, Case No. 3:2003cv00565 (E.D. Tenn. 2005, Judge Phillips) (Judgment for client after creating new 6th Cir. law on service of process) (Internet)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Koninklijke Ahold NV, Opposition No. 91123804 (TTAB 2005) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Emachines, Inc. v. Samtack Computer, Opposition No. 91162784 (TTAB 2005) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. PMH Capital Limited c/o Paul Hill, Case No. 442294 (National Arbitration Forum 2005) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Compaid, Case No. 520654 (National Arbitration Forum 2005) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Ford Motor Co. v. Mill Supply, Inc., Case No. 2:2004cv71120 (E.D. Mich. 2005, Judge Cleland) (Keyword Advertising) (Trademark, Copyright, False Advertising)
  • Paxar Americas, Inc. f/k/a Monarch Marking Systems v. Cosco, Inc. d/b/a Garvey Office Products, Case No. 3:2003cv00245 (S.D. Ohio 2005, Judge Ovington) (Unfair Competition)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Electric Power Research, Opposition No. 91162057 (TTAB 2005) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Leisure Tours Int'l c/o John Sullivan, Case No. 381271 (National Arbitration Forum 2005) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Emachines, Inc. v. Overstock.com, Opposition No. 91163235 (TTAB 2005) (Defendant withdrew trademark application) (Trademark)
  • Baldwin Piano Inc. v. Deutsche Wurlitzer GmbH, 392 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2004, Judge Easterbrook) (Licensing)
  • Grand Vehicle Works Holdings Corp. v. Mill Supply, Inc., Case No. 1:2004cv01915 (N.D. Ill. 2004, Judge Conlon) (Trademark, Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Huang, Chen, Case No. FA0407000291451 (NAF 2004) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Emma J. Barkuloo Trust, Opposition No. 91115538 (TTAB 2004) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Entridia Corporation, Opposition No. 91125577 (TTAB 2004) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. SWP Net Inc., Cancellation No. 92040500 (TTAB 2004) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Schiff, Karen L., Opposition No. 91154173 (TTAB 2004) (Case settled and dismissed without prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Group III International Ltd., by assignment from Gateway Luggage Co., Inc., Cancellation No. 92042393 (TTAB 2004) (Registration cancelled) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. The Linksys Group, Inc., Opposition No. 91155818 (TTAB 2004) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Jackson, Albert, Case No. FA0311000214461 (NAF 2004) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Daniel Melnechuk, Cancellation No. 92040211 (TTAB 2003) (Case settled) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Popular Enterprises, LLC v. American Consumers First, Case No. D2003-0742 (WIPO 2003) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Commerce Capital Group LLC, Opposition No. 91124292 (TTAB 2003) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Inceptor, Inc., Opposition No. 91152012 (TTAB 2003) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Netgateway, Inc., Opposition No. 91119728 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Reiman Publications, LLC v. Alliant Foodservice, Inc., Opposition No. 91124811 (TTAB 2003) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Alliant Foodservice, Inc. v. Reiman Publications, L.L.C., Opposition No. 91121606 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Wireless Retail, Opposition No. 91156742 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Ishoni Networks, Opposition No. 91125572 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Netgateway, Inc., Opposition No. 91119791 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Netgateway Corp., Opposition No. 91121354 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Netgateway, Inc., Opposition No. 91119722 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • Netgateway Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., Cancellation No. 92031240 (TTAB 2003) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (General)
  • Expedia, Inc. v. Richard Mandanice, Case No. FA0302000146598 (NAF 2003) (Domain name transferred to client) (Internet, E-Commerce and Computer Technology)
  • Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC v. F. Barkow Inc., Cancellation No. 92040860 (TTAB 2003) (Trademark)
  • F. Barkow Inc. v. Workhorse Custom Chassis, Opposition No. 91120710 (TTAB 2003) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • PepsiCo, Inc. v. National Beverage Corporation, Case No. 0:2002cv61074 (S.D. Fla. 2003, Judge Marra) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. International Data Group, Cancellation No. 92032845 (TTAB 2002) (Registration cancelled) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. New Gateway, Inc., Opposition No. 91151284 (TTAB 2002) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Monarch Business Forms, Opposition No. 91108225 (TTAB 2002) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Travelscape, Inc. v. Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc., Opposition No. 91124435 (TTAB 2002) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. MacChina LLC, Opposition No. 91123947 (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Moore North America, Opposition No. 91120982 (TTAB 2002) (Defendant abandoned application) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Software Technologies, Opposition No. 91117912 (TTAB 2002) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. AFX Technology Group, Opposition No. 91120401 (TTAB 2001) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems, Inc. v. Independent Machine Service of Minnesota, Inc., Case No. 3:2001cv00181 (S.D. Ohio 2001, Judge Rice) (JURY TRIAL) (Monarch awarded $3.35 million) (Unfair Competition, Patents)
  • OneTravel.com, Inc. v. Expedia, Inc., Opposition No. 91122036 (TTAB 2001) (Proceeding dismissed) (Trademark)
  • Blake Bookstaff, re Lifestyle Fascination, Inc. v. Innerwise, Inc., John Doe #1 d/b/a Popularcategories.com, and John Does # 2-10, Case No. 3:2001cv00646 (D. N.J. 2001 Judge Brown, Jr.) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Ericsson Inc., Opposition No. 91121060 (TTAB 2001) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • John Zink Co. v. Zink, 241 F.3d 1256 (10th Cir. 2001, Judge Briscoe) (affirming award of attorneys' fees to John Zink Co.) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Gateway Systems, Inc. v. Gateway 2000, Inc., Opposition No. 91117634 (TTAB 2001) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Gateway, Inc. v. Gateway Systems, Inc., Case No. 1:200cv00316 (N.D. Ill. 2000, Judge Hibbler) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Chefwear, Inc. v. Success-Tailored Chefwear, Case No. 1:2000cv04607 (N.D. Ill. 2000, Judge Guzman) (Order of default judgment entered in favor of client, awarding injunctive relief, costs, disbursements and attorneys' fees) (General)
  • Abtrax Pharmaceutical Company d/b/a Summitt Hill Laboratories v. Freudenberg & Company, Freudenberg Nonwovens, LP and Ford Motor Company, Case No. 1:1996cv01208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000, Judge Batts) (Proceeding dismissed) (Trademark)
  • Gateway 2000, Inc. v. Softbahn, Inc., Opposition No. 91112204 (TTAB 2000) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Bretford Mfg. v. Smith System Mfg. Co., 116 F.Supp.2d 951 (N.D. Ill. 2000, Judge Grady) (awarding client summary judgment) (Trade Dress Infringement)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. GPOA, Cancellation No. 92029910 (TTAB 2000) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Monarch Business Forms, Case No. 3:1998cv00415 (S.D. Ohio 1999, Judge Merz) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Gateway 2000, Inc. v. Stew Leonard's, Opposition No. 91104890 (TTAB 1999) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Saramar Corporation, Opposition No. 91113544 (TTAB 1999) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Sara Lee Corporation v. Alliant Foodservice, Inc., Opposition No. 91111615 (TTAB 1999) (Proceeding dismissed without prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Executone Information Systems, Inc., Opposition No. 91109730 (TTAB 1999) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Ariel Corporation, Opposition No. 91110523 (TTAB 1999) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Baxter International, Inc. v. Labrada Bodybuilding Nutrition, Inc., Opposition No. 91111280 (TTAB 1999) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Matthew Klujian & Sons, Inc. v. Peter Klujian, Amie Klujian, Peter Klujian Carpet Company, Inc. and Klujian Carpets & Cleaning, Inc., Case No. 1:1997cv08071 (N.D. Ill. 1998, Judge Denlow) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Electronic Data Systems, Opposition No. 91108180 (TTAB 1998) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Cyrix Inc., Case No. 1:1997cv00118 (D. Del. 1997, Judge Longobardi) (Unfair Competition)
  • FASA Corp. v. Playmates Toys Inc., 108 F.3d 140 (7th Cir. 1997, Judge Wood) (Copyright Infringement)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Comtec Information Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:1996cv00398 (S.D. Ohio 1997, Judge Dlott) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Comtec Information Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:1996cv00405 (S.D. Ohio 1997, Judge Dlott) (Trademark Infringement)
  • H&R Block v. Ray L. Newlin, et al., Case No. 97-3349 (7th Cir. 1997) (Unfair Competition)
  • H&R Block v. Ray L. Newlin, et al., 1996 WL 914126 (N.D. Ind. 1996, Judge Rodovich) (Unfair Competition)
  • Holiday Inns, Inc. v. 800 Reservation, Inc., Earthwinds Travel, Inc. d/b/a Earthwinds Travel Agency, and Call Management Systems, Inc., 86 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 1996, Judge Daughtrey) (Trademark)
  • Harmony Gold U.S.A. Inc. v. FASA Corp., 40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1057 (N.D. Ill. 1996, Judge Andersen) (Copyright Infringement)
  • Sea World, Inc. v. Mary Ann Brown d/b/a Undersea World, Case No. 3:1996cv00391 (N.D. Cal. 1996, Judge Orrick) (General)
  • Monarch Marking Systems Inc. v. Elan Systems Inc., 39 U.S.P.Q.2d 1032 (TTAB 1996, Rice, Seeherman and Hanak) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Dynabyte, Opposition No. 91070813 (TTAB 1985) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • FASA Corp. v. Playmates Toys Inc., 869 F.Supp. 1334 (N.D. Ill. 1994, Judge Castillo) (Trade Dress)
  • Independent Machine v. Monarch Marking Systems, Opposition No. 91090232 (TTAB 1994) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. C & D Charter Power Systems, Inc., Opposition No. 91091723 (TTAB 1994) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Independent Machine v. Monarch Marking Systems, Opposition No. 91087759 (TTAB 1994) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Independent Machine v. Monarch Marking Systems, Opposition No. 91089994 (TTAB 1994) (Trademark Infringement)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Corometrics Medical Systems, Inc., Cancellation No. 92019434 (TTAB 1994) (Defendant consented to amend application) (Trademark)
  • Melvin C. Dill v. Monarch Marking Systems, Opposition No. 91088566 (TTAB 1994) (Proceeding dismissed with prejudice) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Melvin C. Dill, Case No. 3:1991cv00484 (S.D. Ohio 1993, Judge Rice) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Syntellect, Inc., Opposition No. 91085723 (TTAB 1993) (Opposition sustained) (General)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Mason Marking Systems Corporation, Opposition No. 91086692 (TTAB 1993) (Defendant amended application) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Monarch Software, Inc., Opposition No. 91086526 (TTAB 1992) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. CFL Knowledge Systems, Inc., Opposition No. 91086888 (TTAB 1992) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Hillary Software, Opposition No. 91079415 (TTAB 1992) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Pathfinder Vue-File System, Cancellation No. 92018705 (TTAB 1991) (Cancellation granted) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Dialcon, Opposition No. 91080640 (TTAB 1990) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Alan D. Zielinski d/b/a Skillmaster, Opposition No. 91081341 (TTAB 1990) (General)
  • John Zink Company v. Zinkco, Case Nos. 88-1560 and 88-1665 (10th Cir. 1990, Judges Anderson, Baldock and Greene) (TrademarkDeceptive Trade)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Monarch Press, Inc., Opposition No. 91080749 (TTAB 1989) (Defendant abandoned application) (Trademark)
  • Monarch Marking Systems v. Pathfinder Graphics Associates, Opposition No. 91077018 (TTAB 1989) (Opposition sustained) (Trademark)

back to top

ADR

  • Buntrock v. Terra (Terra Museum), et al. , Case No. 00 CH 13859 (Circuit Court of Cook County, Judge Kinnaird); 151 F.Supp.2d 931 (N.D. Ill. 2001, Judge Bucklo); 348 Ill. App. 3d 875 (2004) (Trustee Mismanagement)

back to top

Professional Activities

  • AIPLA : Co-Chair of the Decisional Law subcommittee of AIPLA's Anti-Counterfeiting and Anti-Piracy Committee
  • ABA Subcommittee on Foreign Trademark Law : Former Chair
  • L'Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (AIPPI) Trademark Harmonization Committee : U.S. Delegate
  • French-American Chamber of Commerce : Vice President and Immediate Past President
  • Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago: Former Board Member; Internet Committee : Former Chair
  • Yale Law School Executive Committee : Vice President
  • Yale Law School Association in Chicago : Chair
  • Chicago Chapter of l'Ordre des Canardiers : Founder
  • Chicago-Paris Sister Cities Committee : Chair
  • DePaul University School of Law : Former Adjunct Professor

back to top

Publications

back to top

Presentations

  • "Proving and Defending Damage Claims in Trademark Litigation," 55th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference, John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL (February 2011).
  • "Parallel Imports - the U.S. Perspective." INTA Annual Meeting, Berlin, Germany (May 2008).

back to top